Friendship and institutional roles: relational goods under pressure
Last modified: 2009-05-08
Abstract
Relational goods are recognized in economic theory as relevant entities that impact on economic transactions. Meanwhile they are seen as sources of happiness. Among relational goods friendship is a complex one related with trust, reputation and reciprocity but also with freedom and gratuity. In this work we focus our analysis on friendship trying to explore different uses economic agents can make of it. Beyond well-known negative use of it (i.e. corruption or collusion) or positive ones, there could be faded economic or business situations where friendship could be objectively or subjectively put in a trade-off versus other values.
Consider the particular case of being agents appointed of an institutional role. In this case more than a resource - to be consumed enhancing economic transactions -friendship can put agents in a dilemma producing unpredictable outcomes. We show, through a survey, that despite a group of people share a common vision on relational goods, the use they would make in a business situation might be quite different. Drafting lines of deeper analysis, the intensity of friendship (friends, acquaintances, others) and intensity of stake are hypothesis for explaining different outcomes.
Bibliography
Bruni L., Reciprocity, Altruism and the Civil Society, Routledge, 2008
Dohmen T., Falk A., Huffman D., Sunde U., Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on behavioural Outcomes, ROA-RM Maastricht University, 2008
Grayson K., “Friendship versus business in marketing relationship”, Journal of Marketing, vol. 71, oct. 2007
Gui B., Sugden R. (eds.), Economics and Social Interaction, Cambridge, 2005
Halpern J.J., The effect of friendship on bargaining: experimental studies of personal business transactions, Academy of Management Proceeding, 1992
Kadushin C., Friendship among the French financial elite, American sociological review, vol. 60 n. 2, apr. 1995
Nadler D.A., “Confessions of a trusted counselor”, Harvard Business Review, sept. 2005
Full Text: PDF